







|
Learning the ABCs 
by: Donald Jay Korn
from: Financial Planning
November, 1998
In simpler times, there were three TV networks,
one long-distance telephone company and two types of mutual funds: load and no-load.
Investors could do their own fund picking and avoid sales charges.
Alternatively, clients who needed the advice of a registered rep would pay a
one-time upfront sales charge.
In the idiom of the day, an investor might pay
$10,000 and se $850 paid to a broker, meaning that $9,150 was in the account "working
for him."
That straightforward approach has been replaced
by an alphabet soup of share "classes" among funds that carry sales commissions.
The basic framework includes:
- A shares with initial loads. Sometimes A
shares are sold without the load - at net asset value (NAV) - in wrap programs where
investors pay asset management fees.
- B shares without initial loads. In a typical
scenario, B shares impose deferred sales charges that taper off over a period of five to
seven years. During this period, B shares impose annual expenses greater than those
of A shares. when the deferred sales charge no longer applies, B shares often
convert to A shares, with lower expense ratios.
- C shares without initial loads. The deferred
sales charge usually applies only for a year. There is no conversion to A shares so
the higher expense ratio applies indefinitely.
this lineup can be confusing to many investors
and to more than a few financial planners. Moreover, one fund family's B shares may
not be the same as another family's B shares. "The specifics vary quite a bit
from fund to fund," says Mike Stout, a senior analyst at Morningstar. "You
need to read the fine print to discover the differences. In general, though,
long-term investors are best served by A shares, and short-term investors are better off
with C shares."
To help planners make such distinctions,
Morningstar crunches the numbers for multi-share load funds and publishes
"recommended holding periods."
At Davis New York Venture Fund, for example,
Morningstar recommends A shares for holding periods of 6.5 years or longer, and C shares
for holding periods up to 6.5 years. (For holding periods of 6 to 6.5 years [!], the
B shares are recommended along with the C shares.)
The A-long, C-short rule may be easy to master,
but there are plenty of exceptions. At Dreyfus Premier Core Value Fund, the A shares
beat the B and C shares no matter what the holding period, according to Morningstar.
Yet at Dreyfus Premier Value Fund, the A shares are not recommended at all:
Morningstar gives the nod to the C shares for up to six years and the B shares for
longer holding periods.
With all of these conflicting signals, how are
planners supposed to serve clients in the real world, given the uncertainty about holding
periods? "A lot of clients say that they're long-term investors", says
Richard Van Benschoten, a financial planner with Cowan Financial Group in New York,
"but that's not always the case. Last summer, when the market turned down, you
saw many investors sell their fund shares."
Financial planners tend to emphasize long-term
goals so their clients are most likely to buy A shares. It's worth paying more
upfront, the reasoning goes, because ongoing fees will be reduced. Share classes
that charge higher expense ratios (B and C shares) impose increasing fees if the
investor's portfolio appreciates, which hopefully will be the case. thus, some
planners say that investors are better off paying a one-time initial sales charge.
"For long-term investors, A shares are the
way to go," says jackie Coyne Figliola, senior vice president at Financial Network
Investment Corp. in Torrance, Calif. "Altogether, I'd say that 75% of our
orders for load funds are A shares, either sold with a front load or at NAV."
Elaine collins, a planner in Libertyville, Ill.,
agrees that most investors should choose the A shares. "I don't think I've ever
recommended a B share." To take the sting out of front loads, Collins bills her
clients on a fee-offset bases. "I'll quote my clients a fee for my services,
then I'll recommend whatever mutual fund I think is best for their needs, load or
no-load," she says. "If I do receive a commission, I'll reduce the fee I
charge by that amount, so the client will pay the same amount no matter which funds I
recommend."
In some situations, though, there may be
advantages to going beyond A to B or C. Some clients don't like the idea of writing
a check for $10,000, so these share classes may encourage reluctant investors to venture
into mutual funds. Moreover, some planners believe that the deferred sales charges
may discourage harmful in-and-out behavior.
"B and C shares may be appropriate where the
adviser is going to have a relationship that goes beyond recommending which funds to
buy," says Chet Helck, senior vice president at Investment Management & Research
in Atlanta. "If the adviser is going to provide a great deal of monitoring and
support, B and C shares can help spread the costs over many years."
Nevertheless, at IM&R, B shares are the least
popular class of funds, Helck says. "It's relatively easy for clients to
understand A shares, either sold with a front-load or at NAV in fee-based plans.
Similarly, clients can understand C shares, which impose a sales charge that's the
same percentage each year. B shares, on the other hand, are more complex and may be
the hardest to understand. Actually, B shares aren't a bad structure, as long as
both the adviser and the client understand how they work."
Indeed, B shares may be appropriate in some
situations. "The dollars generally are about the same in A or B shares,"
Stout says. "With B shares, though, the investor pays those dollars over a
period of years rather than upfront." Morningstar's analysis points to several
funds (Zweig Trust Strategy, for example, and MFS Capital Opportunities) in which the B
shares pencil out to be better for long-term investors than the A shares.
"I use a software program [Multiple Class
Calculator for Mutual Funds from Money Marketing Inc. of Croton-on-Hudson, N.Y.] that
shows how the various classes compare," says Richard Jaffe, managing executive at
Royal Alliance Associates in New York. "Often, when you run the numbers, the B
shares wind up to be best for the client."
That doesn't mean Jaffe always recommends B
shares. "On a large order, where a discount on the front load is available, the
A shares may be better. In fact, our compliance department won't accept an order for
B or C shares on large orders where A shares are inexpensive."
What's more, B shares may come burdened with
excess baggage. "Some B shares never convert to A shares," says Stout,
"so the investor keeps on paying the higher annual expenses."
Roxanne Fleszar, a planner in Peabody,
Mass., recently observed the dark side of B shares. "I was called in to advise
a business owner who had been self-managing his company's profit-sharing plan," she
says. "For years, the plan had been buying and holding B shares that never had
converted to A shares."
According to Fleszar, the B shares
carried an expense ratio of 1.84% while the fund's A shares had an expense ratio of 1.08%.
"I told the business owner this would be all right if the broker who sold the
funds had been providing extensive support service: asset allocation, portfolio
reviews, fund monitoring. The owner said that wasn't the case; the broker had
provided no support at all. The client didn't have any idea of what B shares were or
why he was buying them."
Whether or not B shares convert to A shares, they
may be sold as "no-loads." That is, investors are told that they pay no
charge up front and no deferred sales charge either, as long as they hold on for six years
or so.
"Many funds are sold on this basis,"
Collins says, "but that's deceptive. Investors will wind up paying the broker
through higher annual expenses."
Ironically, B shares may pose problems even for
planners who generally recommend no-load funds. "Many new clients come to us
with funds already in their portfolio," says Stewart Welch III, a planner in
Birmingham, Ala. "We then have to decide if they should sell the old funds and
reinvest in new ones that we've screened, perhaps paying some capital gains tax.
That decision is more difficult if the client holds B shares, with a deferred sales
charge. We're more likely to recommend that the client retain those shares for a
while, at least until that deferred sales charge disappears or becomes negligible."
Welch says he has noticed situations in which a
new client has previously purchased A or B shares, only to see a highly prized portfolio
manager leave the fund. "Then what does the client do? Stay with a fund
that has an unproven manager? Leaving the fund means either forfeiting the upfront
load or paying a deferred sales charge. From that point of view, investors buying
load funds have a lot more flexibility with C shares: They can leave the fund with
no penalty after one year."
Thus, C shares appeal to some planners and their
clients. Wes Bigler, a planner with Financial Network Investment Corp. in Atlanta,
says he generally sells A shares at NAV to clients who invest through the firm's
"personal asset management" (PAM) wrap account. "Some clients,
though, prefer to buy C shares outside of a PAM account," he says. "Either
way, I'm essentially getting paid on the basis of assets under management. I haven't
sold a fund with an upfront load for years."
What about B shares? "They're too
restrictive," Bigler says. "Clients feel like they're locked in for years.
With C shares, there's no deferred sales charge after one year."
To make matters even more difficult, mutual fund
share classes go beyond A-B-C to M (in Putnam funds), T (in Fidelity Advisor funds) and Y
(one way of designating shares for institutional investors) and so on. "No
matter how many classes of shares there are, planners should explain all the options to
clients," Van Benshcoten says. "If this explanation confuses some clients,
it's up to the planner to make a recommendation. Clients trust planners to advise
them, so you need to really learn about the different share classes in order to earn that
trust." |